Blocking players from seeing you on line

#0 - May 6, 2008, 10:10 p.m.

Is there anyway to block certain players from seeing that you have logged on? There is someone who has latched on to me after a few days questing when all was fine. I helped him out with several of my toons. Then he started telling me all his problems and how he is suicidal etc. And now the very moment I log on he is sending me party invites, to make it easier to "chat". I have discouraged him, telling him I do not want to group, that I cannot handle his problems etc. but he simply does not stop. I stopped playing all my alliance toons because of this, and now only play horde because he doesn't know them.
So, I want him to not know when I log on.
Also there may be times I just want to be left alone and not have anyone know I am logged on. Is this possible? Thanks in advance

Belfaire

#13 - May 7, 2008, 1:21 a.m.

How recently has this player contacted you, Reaverant?

Belfaire

#21 - May 7, 2008, 5:29 a.m.

Q u o t e:
might wanna respond to the Belfaire...

I would like that very much.

Syndri

#30 - May 7, 2008, 5:33 p.m.

Q u o t e:
How recently has this player contacted you, Reaverant?

Re-iterating this question. If there's an answer to be provided, I would sincerely appreciate a response. Please.

Syndri

#34 - May 7, 2008, 6:31 p.m.

There's not enough information provided or available at present to narrow a search, Skerion. It be would akin to looking for a needle in a very, very large haystack. =/

Syndri

#36 - May 7, 2008, 8:05 p.m.

Zuzu, I like you. I really do. But this is not a topic to be quipping. Such situations (or potential situations) are very serious matters.

Syndri

#38 - May 7, 2008, 8:08 p.m.

Thank you. I really do appreciate it. :)

Syndri

#41 - May 7, 2008, 8:28 p.m.

Q u o t e:
This is what I was trying to express, only I used about five words. I hope we leave this one - its a very important point to make.

It wasn't necessarily what you said, Zuzu; it was precise phrase used to convey your intent—which, I admit, I misinterpreted. Highlighting a particular phrase and then using the "obvious [x] is obvious" tends to insinuate a more negative connotation.

My apologies for assuming a flippant tone when there was none. Regardless, removing it was probably best, as it don't want others to bounce off that statement in turn.

Syndri

#47 - May 8, 2008, 4:41 p.m.

Could you do me a huge favor and reply to the email sent yesterday to your registered address, Reaverant? I'd really appreciate it. :)

Syndri

#52 - May 8, 2008, 5:12 p.m.

Stop the infighting.

Thanks for responding via email, Rev. :)