Q u o t e:
.....should this be happening? I thought we won!
Q u o t e:
No. They failed to complete the main objective.
In any other contest, it matters not what the stats are at the end of the contest...only who won the match.
Q u o t e:
To be honest, i think this points out a pretty big flaw in the system- like how a team can pull out more objectives in the bg and still lose.
I hppe that the 2.4 patch fixes stuff like this.
Could the devs also just take a good look at the overall design of this bg. There are a ton of good posts on the subject.
I understand that mirroring the bases is not an option, i wouldnt want that anyway. But they should be equivalent in number of entry ways, npc aggro paths, npc support structure and tower defendablity.
I always thought it was kinda... dumb that an alliance bunker gets support from its own archers and horde bunkers are pretty much a "gimmie" when you get inside.
Likewise, i think balinda needs a complete overhaul. She is much more managable then galv, simple due to the cast times and such. Maybe make her a new class all together. Buffing her and vann's (i still don't get why you buffed vann's hp to compensate for bals weakness btw) hp did not change the fact that her design is just weak compared to galvs.
Oh well, this is not relevent to the post, and im sure will get ignored. But it can't hurt to try.
