Score one for Big Brother

#0 - Nov. 3, 2006, 1:51 a.m.
Blizzard Post
“Censorship always defeats it own purpose, for it creates in the end the kind of society that is incapable of exercising real discretion.” – Henry Steele Commager

These words were no doubt spoken without the vaguest concept of a virtual world where elves, undead, and magic inhabit. But virtual or not, and magical it may be, the world of Warcraft is a collection of real people, and thus a society to which these words apply. As such, the punishment for the expression of thought should not only be frowned upon, but fought against with unequalled vigor.

The purpose of this post is to confront Blizzard’s current policies regarding language.

It has come to my attention that you can be banned for guild-chat comments, raid comments, and even private channel chit-chat should the language become too worrisome. I reviewed Blizzard’s policy, and came across this:

To help prevent the harassment of other players, we have implemented an array of in-game tools that players can use to help protect themselves from such abuse.

• The Ignore command: By typing /ignore (character name) the player will no longer hear any form of standard chat from the character name being ignored.
• The Profanity Filter: By default, all inappropriate words in our profanity database will be filtered. They will appear on screen as jumbled characters. Example: &*@#$

Now, with these tools in place, how exactly is a person supposed to become a repeat offender, thus warranting a suspension? I’m perplexed as to understand how someone who is either being filtered or ignored can possibly offend someone else. The case must be that the offended refuses to utilize these tools, and would rather anonymously /report, than address any issues he/she is having. I don’t blame them at all. Why, wouldn’t it be nice to accuse someone in this country of America of a crime, and hide behind the scenes while a punishment is doled out? Oh that’s right!

My good friend the 6th amendment told me:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.”

Perhaps there was some logic surrounding this policy? I don’t know, I didn’t write it, I just work here. I think what they are trying to avoid is the situations that I see cropping up within my own circle of friends – a state of fear. I have to filter myself in order to avoid the possible suspensions, where is the /command for that, Blizzard? I’m offended by anonymous /reporters, where is my protection against that?

Perhaps with the removal of anonymous /reporting, people would have to do the unthinkable and address their issues within their social circles as an adult, or actually talk to their offenders. Crazy I know.

Yes, this post is a response to bans that have happened within my circle of friends. Yes, those events are the fuel for this post. And yes, I enjoy being a foul-mouthed pig when I please.

-Deeb
#30 - Nov. 3, 2006, 2:52 a.m.
Blizzard Post
What many players seem not to realise when they cite the Profanity Filter as reasoning why vulgar language should be allowed in World of Warcraft is that this feature exists solely as an additional layer of defense against behaviour that is already considered to be a violation of policy.

As using inappropriate language is specifically prohibited by the Terms of Use -- both to encourage an atmosphere in which players may be comfortable, and to uphold the Teen rating granted by the ESRB -- whether or not the reporting player is using their Profanity Filter is immaterial. The purpose of the filter is so that players who do not wish to view profanity may shield themselves from some of the more common terms, but that does not by any means suggest that they have waived their right to report players for what is a clear breach of the Harassment Policy.

Let's use an analogy; those are always fun:

Everyone has the option of wearing a bulletproof vest. Does that mean it's legal to shoot them, because they have less chance of being hurt?

The answer, friends, is a resounding no.

The act of firing a weapon at someone is still illegal, even though there are preventative measures that can be taken to avoid (or at least lessen) injury. Likewise, it's against our policies to use vulgarity, even though people can use their filter to avoid seeing it. Crazy world we live in, huh?

You claim to live in a "state of fear" because you're concerned about being reported for what is, by your own admission, a violation of our Terms of Use. I would urge you to reconsider the agreements you have made in order to play World of Warcraft, and how well those agreements are being upheld by your actions in-game. Rather than demanding to know who is rightfully bringing your inappropriate behaviour to our attention, perhaps it would behoove you to examine your own conduct when dealing with your peers; the issue here lies not in their desire to play in a friendly and constructive environment, but rather in your efforts to circumvent the policies to which you have, time and time again, agreed to adhere.

If you're offended by anonymous reporters, there's a simple solution: Do not violate our policies. Please be a foul-mouthed pig elsewhere. :)
#34 - Nov. 3, 2006, 2:57 a.m.
Blizzard Post
Q u o t e:
So where in this contract to protect those offended does it protect those wrongfully accused of harrassment?


Those who have not violated our policies shall not have action taken against them. Is that not protection enough? :)
#37 - Nov. 3, 2006, 3:15 a.m.
Blizzard Post
Q u o t e:
And how do you guarantee this? Or am i suppose to take your word. How do you verify what has been done/said? Not trying to be a smart ass, just wondering.


I'm not at liberty to discuss the exact methods used of determining whether a violation of policy has occurred -- the more transparent our internal processes become, the easier it is for them to be circumvented -- but suffice it to say that we employ multiple levels of verification before any serious repercussions are doled out. Furthermore, in the event that a player believes a prior judgment to be unfair or unwarranted, the option to contest actions taken against one's account is always available in the form of contacting Account Administration via e-mail or webform.
#82 - Nov. 5, 2006, 12:33 a.m.
Blizzard Post
And here I thought this thread could last a bit longer before regressing into arguments; looks like I was wrong about that. Locked. :)