AGGAMAGAN server is totaly DEAD

#0 - Jan. 8, 2008, 5:38 p.m.

I dont know if blizzard can help this server because we are like 100 online in this server everyday.

THAT SUX

AGGAMAGAN WAS THE MOST HIGHT POPULATION before :(

Plz blizzard

AGGAMAGAN NEED HELP !!!!

Drysc

#6 - Jan. 8, 2008, 5:43 p.m.

No, it actually has a very healthy population.

Drysc

#20 - Jan. 8, 2008, 5:48 p.m.

Q u o t e:

I'm just curious if Aggamagan has a "Healthy" population then how would you describe Blackrock's population?

Blackrock has always been overpopulated.

Drysc

#23 - Jan. 8, 2008, 5:50 p.m.

Q u o t e:
Maybe they should start referring new players to Aggamagan instead of Aggramar....AGAIN!

Uh ... people are transferring OFF of Aggramar. Hence, "source".

Drysc

#46 - Jan. 8, 2008, 6:23 p.m.

Q u o t e:
I am talking very seriously...

If you guys can take all LOW server and make 1 HIGHT server ....

I think its a very good idea ..

I dunoo

Server merging is of course a possibility (however drastic), but since Agamaggan isn't a low-population realm there's no reason to believe it would be included in any such measures.

Drysc

#57 - Jan. 8, 2008, 6:33 p.m.

Q u o t e:
I think that Aggamagan has a somewhat healthy Horde population although many have left recently both individually and whole guilds, but I don't run into very many Alliance players here. Even in Shatt where everyone ques up for BGs the Alliance side is empty while there's about 35 Horde players standing around waiting for BGs. Although, Gummi Bears and other TBC endgame guilds have left, there are other guilds working towards the 25 man instances.

So I guess it's unfair to say that the whole server is dead but rather that maybe the Alliance side could use a boost? I don't know...just my two cents on the matter.

-Zyex

Looking at the last month the horde/alliance ratio is near dead-on 1:1. It might be that more alliance are leveling alts, or there's just simply more level 70 horde.

Drysc

#114 - Jan. 8, 2008, 11:25 p.m.

Q u o t e:

I just checked the list and for some reason at the realm select screen shows Agamaggan as LOW

Realm population tags in the selection list are relative to other realm populations.

For instance, (and these are by no means accurate to how it compares the data) realm A has 1000 people, realm B has 900 people, and realm C has 800.

Realm C could potentially show as "low".

Obviously there are far more than 1000 people on any one realm and far more than three realms to compare, but you get the idea.