#20 - Aug. 27, 2010, 10:34 p.m.
Q u o t e:
I feel like [Removed]is a pretty well defined and generally accepted to stand for what we all know it stands for.
Yes, but at the same time, Maeby, the acronym is truly becoming part of our everyday vocabulary. There are several words that 10 years ago would be considered taboo but are now used on a continual basis in radio, TV, public speaking, etc. . . .
Q u o t e:
I've found that it seems you have to keep reporting issues until you find the "right GM". That bothers me
some. It seems like a huge unnecessary tax on the ticketing system. I know that all GMs are human, and subject to their own perspective on matters, but it seems that there isn't much of a defined policy when it comes to some things.
I'm afraid your perception regarding what is happening is incorrect. It isn't a matter of reporting until you find the "right GM". Naming issues are not always black and white and the initial report isn't necessarily going to result in a name change. Names are subjective at best, especially when it comes to words, phrases or acronyms that may be borderline mainstream.
We do have policies and procedures to handle such issues, they are not subjective to a Game Masters own perspective. Unfortunately, I am unable to provide further insight into our internal workings and can only encourage you to report names that you feel violate our policies. If the name is not changed and you think an error has occurred please write to
wowgmfeedback-us@blizzard.com and your petition and the actions of the Game Master can be reviewed further.