#0 - July 18, 2009, 5:57 p.m.
Q u o t e:
No I guess I didn't see it before. I am just speaking from my own personal perspective and experience. I know there are always two sides to any argument. And I will go and read that thread since it pertains to my issue.
Q u o t e:
authenticators should be free.
They should come with every package of wotlk sold in stores wether it be from wal-mart or online.
Seeing as how blizzard owns our accounts, items, characters and not us,,,,,, then the responsibility is not as much ours as some of the <removed> on here wants everyone to believe.
Q u o t e:
Let's keep this civil and constructive, folks.
Q u o t e:
because suggestion forums are rarely looked over by anyone affiliated by blizzard and when they do look they never listen to anyone's suggestions anyway.
Q u o t e:
i have to wonder... has it ever occurred to anyone that the sheer volume of accounts being hacked could be on blizzard's end?
Q u o t e:
does anyone out there truly believe that ALL of blizzard's empolyees are HONEST???????
Q u o t e:
I just feel completely frustrated since I have received no response from my emails to account administration since the 9th of July. I pay to play this game and to have this happen just makes me so angry. There is no phone number I can call besides billing, and I am discouraged from calling that number because that is not their department. I just feel like such a small fish in a huge ocean.... I am robbed of one of my favorite things to do when I get off work and have been for over ten days. It's not right. If I didn't like this game so much I would have given up already, I don't know what else I can do besides complain to expedite a resolution to my problem.
Q u o t e:
With that all said, as unsettling—and, perhaps, as humbling—as it may be, accepting that compromises occur client-side is the first and most important step to bolstering an account's security.
Please know that this assertion is not the blanket assignment of blame. To say that those who are compromised are always to blame for their account compromise is to insinuate, semantically, that each and every affected owner willfully contributed to the dissemination of the account's log in and password. Neither you nor I believe this is the case for all account compromises. Some, yes. All, no.
I am simply asking you to realize that an account owner's network of security may be imperfect. As the old adage goes, "There's more than one way to skin a cat," and, regrettably, this sentiment also holds true in the case of compromise.
One's security may be compromised through malware, for example, or through the unknowing provision of account-specific information (through a phishing email or website). One's email address may be gleaned or Security Answer & Question guessed. Our goal, as end users, is to admit that these threats exist, understand that we have underestimated how secure our systems are, and take the appropriate steps to stengthen our defenses.