#380 - July 8, 2009, 1:31 a.m.
Q u o t e:
Why am I not surprised that you opted to not address any other thing I said?
/patpat There you are troll; I'm done feeding you. ^_^
I decide what to respond to. There's no need to run in circles around an issue. We've stated our stance. Based on the circumstances of this specific case, we feel hunters should not have the ability to possess tamed worgens. The forums aren't simply a ventilation system where players can run in and continually restate the same arguments over and over again, not because they're not being answered, but because the players are not satisfied with the answers.
And now how many people are going to take issue with the fact that I've chosen to respond to your post? Let's go back to your original post. I'll respond to the rest of it.
Q u o t e:
You cannot honestly expect any of us to believe that you would have taken this long if it were actually something game-breaking; so why are you using that excuse for your actions? If Hunters suddenly, at the start of a long holiday weekend, became able to tame players I'm certain we'd have a hotfix within hours if not minutes.
So we're arguing over our response time to this specific issue and you're using a hypothetical situation to support your argument? It's almost as if there's no need to respond to this and engage in a hypothetical debate that ultimately fails to address any of the concerns relating specifically to the fact that we do not want hunters to have worgens as pets, obtained via the exploitation of a bug.
Q u o t e:
It's a skin and a set of animations. It provides no benefit in BGs or Arena, nor will it give anyone any sort of edge in PvE content. At most it benefits RPers in-game as a new and fresh setup for plot. It benefits you, however, because it's just one more draw for one of the more popular classes in the game that pays your wages.
We don't want hunters to have worgens as pets, even particularly given the means necessary to obtain them.
Q u o t e:
And yet I fully understand why you say precedent is irrelevant, and why you don't require logic to make your argument: You hold the reins. We can petition and whine and cry until our little fingers fall off, but ultimately you don't have to do anything you don't want to because no one is in a position to force you to be fair. You're completely capable of such epic levels of trolling as this and not a single one of us can bring any sort of consequence to bear upon you for it because you're the one with the ban button.
I'm not banishing dissent. I'm suspending players for violations of the Code of Conduct.
If you think I'm trolling then you're welcome to email
[email protected]. It is, however, inappropriate to exclaim on these forums how my job should be done, how my posts should be written, and to whom I should be responding.
If you want to talk about trolling, or ultimately getting off track, I don't see how your posts have provided any sort of cure for such an ailment.
