#0 - April 17, 2009, 8:58 p.m.
This should be high priority - when I rolled a death knight you said then that dual wield would be a viable build..
Now months later your saying if it doesn't end up being one then "oh well".
I can't break 4.3k dps on any single target. I can easily push 5-5.3k with a 2hand. The margin will still exist as I gear up in Ulduar gear.
I don't want to sit here for months using a 2hand, that's not why I rolled a death knight. I've made multiple posts in the past 2 days with plenty of observations and constructive feedback which got no attention, 10-20 views and 0 replies.
Nobody cares but you should. All I see is responses to QQ pvp threads or QQ about nerfs. I don't even care about a blue response, the problem is none of the players care either. Sorry if this seems like I'm venting but it's pretty saddening that this was pulled.
The other day you left us with "the possibility of making the frost tree the dual wield tree". Well please hot fix something in, or at the very least the next upcoming small patch. At least give us some raw ideas on what we can do, I've given plenty over the past couple days.
- Increase damage done with frost strike if it's a 1hand wep
- OR allow frost strike to attack with both weapons
- increase blood of the north to 5%
- lower the cd back to 6 seconds on HB
All of these or even one of these have the possibility to at least bring dual weild somewhat up to par with 2h, even if it's a bit behind. Right now it's just being obliterated (no pun intended).
Thanks for your time.
