Blizzard pleaxe clarify.

#0 - April 20, 2009, 7:45 p.m.
Blizzard Post
In a recent post a blue decided to put his two-cents into the convo. which i am very grateful for btw. But thats not what i need clarified. In the post entitled DK Dual wield DPS too low - but not abandoned the blue said That does not mean we have given up on DW for DKs in the same way that we no longer support 2H for Enhancement shamans. Now i would like to bring your attention to the last part of the sentence, which states that you no longer care about giving enhancement a way to spec out of the norm and get our 2hs back. Ok now lets flash forward a bit in the same post and see what the blue posted about the same topic. As I have said many times, we want DKs to be a class that uses 2H or DW. We do not want DW to dominate, as it typically does in classes that have that option. So what your saying is that you dont care about shamans anymore (which in itself is terrible and you should be ashamed) but your also saying that you dont want DW to dominate over the players choice to dps efficiently?

So five quick questions that would be nice to see answered.
1) try and clarify these two posts.
2) do you infact no longer care about enhance 2h?
3) if yes to #2 please elaborate
4) why should enhance have to spec only 1 way to do efficient damage?
5) and finally why do you hate the most fun class in the game ; ;
#6 - April 24, 2009, 3:55 a.m.
Blizzard Post
We want Enhancement to focus on dual-wielding.

I realize that might not always have been our design, and I can understand if you'd prefer something different. We allow rogues to equip bows without giving them talents to support a ranged rogue play style. This is just one of those things.

DKs and warriors are the classes for which we want dual-wielding to be a choice.