#110 - April 9, 2009, 6:58 p.m.
Q u o t e:
The orginal announcement was phrased as a list of key changes that were coming with the patch, and my impression was that they were listed to make players excited.
Since I helped write that announcement, I am fairly certain we said it was subject to change and might not see the light of day. Since players still didn’t make that connection, I’m not sure what to do short of making you sign a document that says “I understand this is not an announcement of changes but just some things the team is working on.”
Q u o t e:
If I were you I'd just not worry about my words being taken out of context and just liberally throw the banhammer at the people who, for reasons of trolling, leveraging for buffs, or just plain idiocy, take them out of context and twist them around. Generally speaking the people who would do that aren't people who are going to contribute anything intelligent to the forums anyway.
Fair enough, but read some of the posts above and below yours. Those players are not irate trolls. They really did think those announcements were for things that would almost certainly come to pass. It may be a vocal minority as some of you say, but it’s vocal enough that “broken promises” threads become a pretty big distraction on the forums.
Q u o t e:
Do not do it as a sticky in some grand "patch preview" thread. The only thing you should be putting in a thread like that are things that are so close to set in stone that the chance is negligable that it will never see the light of day.
That sticky would have maybe one or two bullets in it at the most. Also realize that one of the purposes of those previews is to get players used to the ideas of possible changes. There were some warlocks surprised when we pulled Siphon Life and Immolate our of the Affliction rotation, but many of them had heard us say that was something we might do. While they might not agree with the change, they weren’t totally blindsided by it.
Our design process is a lot more iterative than many of your probably suspect. It's not like PWB is written on the white board and then the next day erased. We talked about it, we tried to figure out how to implement it, and at some point we moved on to other things and realized we probably weren't going to have bandwidth to really do it justice for 3.1. There were some technical reasons and some art reasons. But things are rarely black and white for us. There wasn't a day when PWB (or any feature) slipped from 90% certainly to 75% certainty.
Q u o t e:
Can't you just ignore them and keep the more positive posters/players in mind when deciding what to do or not do?
Ignoring them is easy. You can’t do this job for very long without being pretty good at that skill. :) We are more concerned about creating a negative environment on the forums. Every time we read from a poster who said they came to the forums are were just discouraged by all the QQ, insults and Blizzard bashing and decided to go to other forums, then we die a little inside. Since these forums are an official presence of Blizzard on the net, we want to go farther than just ignoring the bad people.