#0 - March 11, 2009, 5:40 p.m.
feral is higher than 3 pure specs
survival hunter, rogue and warlock are all 10% higher than the top mage spec
Q u o t e:
I can see a tool like this being embraced and contributed to by the community, so I wouldn't dismiss it so quickly. It seems like an excellent idea and can serve the purpose of proving balance to the players and also keeping the developers honest (from the player view, if you know what I am getting at).
Will it be perfect? Never. Will it show a general comparison? That is quite possible.
I could see it possibly importing gear stats from wowhead and drawing up a map of expected dps, or simply putting your own stats in the UI to import.
One could also say the need for such a tool was born from distrust, so I would shy away from "grain of salt" statements. It would be much better to either share your own data (such a mystery it is to all of us) or at least support the use of these tools and correct any misinformation.
Q u o t e:
All mages want from Blizz is for an aknowledgement that will not get left in the scaling basement again. With essentially zero information available on mage changes in 3.1 is it really any wonder mages want to make sure Blizz doesnt make us the most useless class for a second expac????
Q u o t e:
GC, mages are dangerously far behind in dps on the PTR.