#0 - Jan. 29, 2009, 3:39 a.m.
It makes it that much harder to plot my well-intentioned revenge against you.
Dangit
It makes it that much harder to plot my well-intentioned revenge against you.
#2 - Jan. 29, 2009, 4:01 a.m.
Q u o t e:
Who the hell is Zarhym?
Isin... you of all people? I'm disappointed.
#12 - Jan. 29, 2009, 4:05 a.m.
Q u o t e:
http://www.wowwiki.com/Zarhym
All the info you ever need.
Not true. I know a lot of things about Zarhym not listed there.
#22 - Jan. 29, 2009, 4:09 a.m.
Q u o t e:
Why is it that you're posting on the first page of a thread addressed to you, but you fail to post in the 25th of a thread with concerns regarding the whole of World of Warcraft?
The whole World of Warcraft? That sounds serious.
#26 - Jan. 29, 2009, 4:11 a.m.
Q u o t e:
Quick! Post something silly so the CM will quote you!
You are loved for you who are.
#36 - Jan. 29, 2009, 4:16 a.m.
Q u o t e:
Either that or Arenas (majority of PvP) or raids (majority of PvE).
You guys are useless, and I don't care how stupid it is to tell that to a blue's face. I have never seen a useful post by a blue, and I've read a lot. Especially yours. I should tell people to add a blue's name in the title of their thread, so that when the blues look for posts with their name they'd for once stumble upon a useful thread. Of course, they wouldn't post.
I'm pretty saddened that people who are recruited by Blizzard to help, don't.
I could have 11.5 million people telling me how my time should be spent based on their pre-conceived notions about what it is I do here. Does that sound more reasonable? We could open up a poll for every thread created on the forums and elect, by way of democracy, which threads Blizzard employees should respond to.
Q u o t e:
I think Ghostcrawler has him beat on actually communicating with us more about the game itself, but at least Zarhym doesn't give us the usual 'soon'.
Community work is quite a bit different from development, so I'd take Ghostcrawler's development insight over my free character move information any day. ;)
#63 - Jan. 29, 2009, 4:30 a.m.
Q u o t e:
If they can't post in threads where a World of Warcraft question is asked, then they shouldn't ever be allowed to post in these. And if it has been answered, yet they don't post in the thread because of this, then all of them should be fired. They're paid to moderate and assist this community.
Community assistance is less accurate than saying we're paid for community interaction. We're here to represent the community and be a part of the community, and that sometimes requires that we interact on a less-formal level. I wish I got paid for every time someone jumped into a thread to which any Blizzard employee has responded to comment that our focus should be elsewhere.
In all you've said thus far, it seems your real point is that there is a thread out there somewhere you would prefer I respond to rather than this one. Thank you for letting me know.
#68 - Jan. 29, 2009, 4:33 a.m.
Q u o t e:
I've never worked in customer support for pay, but I have tolerated it for over a month. It isn't hard, you just need something else to do at the same time.
I hear ya. For instance, sometimes when I'm getting a little frustrated with a task I'll post on a light-hearted thread... oh wait.
#81 - Jan. 29, 2009, 4:40 a.m.
Q u o t e:
"Why are blues useless?" I don't care if you laugh at me, go ahead. If it takes being laughed at over the internet to get my point across, so be it.
If we were playing a game of questions, I think you'd be disqualified for rhetoric.
#100 - Jan. 29, 2009, 4:49 a.m.
Q u o t e:
Because then it isn't about interacting in a positive way with the community.
It's about defending himself.
You might be right. I'll continue to do what I do as laid out by my superiors rather than seek the opinions of 11.5 million people. Perhaps some day down the line we can be people.
Q u o t e:
wowcmfeedback@blizzard.com
is your only course of action.
This is correct.