Players who rerolled from Priests - Sign

#0 - Jan. 21, 2009, 4:05 p.m.

I'm curious on how many people actually rerolled because they were fed up with how the priest class has been treated in the past and present - talents, skills, pve or pvp. Please also include if you were a Holy Priest but spec'd into the Disc tree because you thought Holy didn't compare to other classes for one reason or another (that's kind of like rerolling).

I, like alot of others, first rolled a priest because it was supposed to be the Best or Most Powerful Healer in the game. A week ago, I finished leveling up a Paly to 80 and spec'd him to Holy to replace my healing priest. I'll still play the priest, but most likely as Shadow Spec'd.

/sign on your new 80 class or your old priest.

Ghostcrawler

#32 - Jan. 21, 2009, 5:02 p.m.

We are not interested in petitions. They are generally too small a sample size to be useful and are not efficient use of forum space.

If you want to talk about why you no longer play your priest, giving reasons will be much more helpful. (Though if your only reasons are "Blizzard hates priests" I suggest you not post at all.)

Ghostcrawler

#186 - Jan. 22, 2009, 5:06 p.m.

Q u o t e:
Really then, if this post bothers you, lock or delete it. There was no shortage of that last night and it was fine by me. I think people are interested in talking to people about re-rolling. Possibly to get an idea on what classes they rerolled to by what they post on, etc.

It might not be the feedback you want, but if you choose to leave it up, there's still viable feedback to be gleaned from this post. And your 'blue'ing" ensures it will get replies.

I didn't want to lock or delete it because I thought we might get some good feedback (and there has been some). I was trying to steer the conversation away from /signs and get players to explore their reasoning.

Some players have said that they have already outlined all their reasons in other posts. Great. You've done your job. Don't feel the need to keep posting if your words aren't actually conveying information. :)