Frostwyrms and blue responses ,civil question

#0 - March 31, 2009, 1:48 p.m.

http://blue.mmo-champion.com/20/16019603150-new-310-frost-wyrm-mount.html

there`s a link to the original post and what i would like to know ,

why is no one willing to discuss the statements made in this post ?
how can the blizz representative state that he sees no connection between arthas and frostwyrms as its in the intro movie for the whole expansion?
am i allowed ot ask if this is just a gimmic to get people into playing a ( what by a majority of peoples posts ) seems a badly put together season?
am i the only one who thinks the answers in this post were just a little on the terse, verging on rude side?

as ive stated before im new to posting in these particular forums so if i broke rules in my original post then /apologies.

Thundgot

#1 - March 31, 2009, 2:12 p.m.

Q u o t e:
how can the blizz representative state that he sees no connection between arthas and frostwyrms as its in the intro movie for the whole expansion?

I'm no mind-reader, but maybe he just meant that he saw no connection between A) the Arthas and Frost Wyrm connection and B) Frost Wyrms being Arena Season rewards? Just a different way of interpreting the same words.

Thundgot

#4 - March 31, 2009, 2:19 p.m.

Q u o t e:
I also assumed he was questioning the connection between the quoted post:

"You don't see why Arthas, the being responsible for frost wyrms in the first place, and Icecrown, the instance he's going to be in, should reward wyrm mounts?"

and the thread, as opposed to a connection between Arthas and frost wyrms.

Good to see I wasn't the only one reading it that way. :)