Too many emblems?

#0 - Feb. 23, 2010, 3:59 p.m.
Blizzard Post
Why have Triumph, Conquest, Valor and Heroism when you can only get the latter 3 by converting the first one?

Basically, what we've got now, is T9 (cost 75 Triumphs) and T8 (cost 58 Conquest).. Why not just make T8 cost 58 Triumphs, since you can't get Conquest anyway? I can't see the logic behind this ...

K, I understand that you could get Conquest in the past, but you can no longer, so why keep them in-game?
#2 - Feb. 23, 2010, 4:04 p.m.
Blizzard Post
Q u o t e:
K, I understand that you could get Conquest in the past, but you can no longer, so why keep them in-game?
Players who may not have played since the emblems were 'phased out' will still have some of them, maybe even a load of them! They'd be very upset if they logged back in to find they had a bag full of useless emblems. It's the same reason we still have the Commendation Officers in the capital cities.
#24 - Feb. 24, 2010, 1:26 p.m.
Blizzard Post
Q u o t e:
sorry but is Commendation officer maloof not a a mailbox now ?
It seems I am a little behind the times, these guys were removed in 3.2. However, the point remains that so long as something has a use, it's not going to simply be removed without massive considerations and research. That is not to say changes wont be made to how emblems work in the future, simply that there are no announced plans for this and no guarantees that changes will be made to the system as it stands.