PvP almost balanced

#0 - Jan. 5, 2010, 12:54 p.m.

Druid: Is viable as both feral and resto wich means they can teamup with almost any class in 2v2 and are fine in 3v3

Hunter: Good in 2's with a healer in 3's they have the choice of beastcleave or more of a ''controll'' setup

Mage: Good for several double DPS setup's and also lethal with a disc priest in 3's they have RMP and Wizcleave

Paladin: The best healer in 2's voor several classes and with a semi-viable dps spec, In 3's often seen as healers or as burstclass in Meleecleave's

Priest: In 2's works great with rogue's mage's druids as healer and as DPS they can preform well with a rogue or a resto druid in 3's they go well with RMP

Rogue: Has lot's of double DPS and Rogue/healer comps and in 3's they work well in melee cleave or RMP

Shaman: Resto shamy's work well together with rogues and feral's and in 3's are often wanted for Bloodlust/heroism as DPS they have some nice burst setup's as Ele and in 3's can play Wizcleave/Beastcleave

Warlock: Deadly as Afliction teamed up with a healer in 2's and in 3's they work well with a DK + healer of Wizardcleave

Warrior: 2v2 not great at douple dps but great with pretty much any good healer and in 3's they have the options of double healer or Meleecleave

The point of this post is why is there all this QQ whilst DK's are the only class lacking a bunch of descent setup's that are perfectly viable for high raitings

Slorkuz

#15 - Jan. 6, 2010, 9:50 a.m.

Q u o t e:
The point of this post is why is there all this QQ whilst DK's are the only class lacking a bunch of descent setup's that are perfectly viable for high ratings.

Unfortunately, quite a few posters on these forums have the tendency of having a bad experience in the game only to run to the forums and write very subjectively biased rant threads. Some of these posts are sadly made as a knee-jerk reaction to something that happened in-game, without much actual thought going into what it was exactly that happened, what led up to it, and how to avoid it in the future.

Take the "x class <big number> crit omg!" threads as an example. They mostly just contain a screenshot of a big crit, and nothing more. What a lot of these players are doing is relying on getting a following to support their claim of x class being "zomg OP" as a simple result of combat log screenshot association. And, for those who don't put much thought into the circumstances around said screenshot, that is enough to jump on the "nerf x" bandwagon.

Ideally, if these players would be a bit more rational and constructive with their postings we would see a lot more intelligent debate and useful feedback on the forums, rather than drivel that gets thrown into the moderation bucket.

Food for thought, perhaps?