But we will draw a line when posts include personal attacks on members of the studio (yes, “cleverly” disguised ones as well).
I thoroughly agree with banning personal attacks- they have no place in these forums (or any civilised discussion for that matter).
However, clarification is required regarding what does or does not constitute a “cleverly disguised” personal attack.
This clarification is needed because “cleverly disguised” is a very open ended phrase and, while the quality of moderation on these forms has typically been very high, there has also been a pattern of overzealous moderation of critical posts and threads which over-interpretation of this phrase could continue.
In particular, for the avoidance of doubt please advise which of the following are or are not acceptable on these forums:
- Criticism of Anet in general
- Criticism of changes being made (or not made) in an area of the game for which Anet has an identifiable developer or team
- Criticism of the quality of work Anet are doing in an area of the game for which Anet has an identifiable developer or team
- Criticism of the processes Anet, its teams or developers use to design and/or implement changes to GW2
(I’ve used the word ‘criticism’ in the above instances, because it is posts of a critical nature or tone that are most likely to be (mis-?) interpreted as personal attacks.)
P.s. I’ve posted this in the GW2 General Forum as it’s not clear where else this should belong.

.